The
least appealing aspect of the Mahabharat,
I feel, is the intrusion of the divine.
The
marvelously multifaceted narrative is, in my opinion, severely compromised by
the heavy-handed attempt to present it all as a good-versus-evil morality tale
orchestrated by God Himself in the form of Sri Krishna.
It’s
not just that I find the idea of an avatar
rather ridiculous. It also makes for lousy fiction.
An
arrogant and cocksure God-in-human-form, always slated to come out on top with
smug smile on face and pithy proverb on lip, makes for an unappealing character
at best, while ruining any element of suspense in the story.
What
if the Mahabharat were presented as
historical fiction without any attempt to inject a “moral of the story”? What
if Krishna was just a man among others, struggling to shape his destiny amidst
the forces of his time, rather than achieving it all by effortless divine will?
To
get a flavor, look no further than “Govinda”,
first book of the “Aryavarta Chronicles”
by debutante author Krishna Udayasankar.
The
geographical backdrop of the novel is Aryavarta, the northern half of the
Indian subcontinent in the second millennium BC. The historical setting is a
deadly conflict between two groups of Brahmins.
On
one side are the Firstborn, scholar and sages, upholders of sacrificial rituals
and social norms, makers and breakers of kings. Opposed to them are the
Firewrights - master scientists, inventors, and iconoclasts.
When
Firewright technology gone awry dries up the Saraswati river - turning a fertile
kingdom to barren desert - the Firstborn seize the opportunity to launch the
Scourge. With the active support of the ruling nobility, Firewrights across the
nation are mercilessly tortured and killed. Some survivors go into hiding;
others seek refuge with kings who are willing to surreptitiously exploit their
expertise to manufacture lethal weapons.
One
such is Jarasandha, king of Magadha, gradually extending his sway over
Aryavarta in a bid to become Emperor. Other kingdoms, including the Kurus and
Panchalas, officially acknowledge his sovereignty, while secretly seeking to
counterbalance his power.
Into
this landscape of intrigue steps the character of Govinda Shauri – the author’s
preferred name for Krishna. Arisen from humble origins as a gwala (cowherd) to become king of
Mathura, he has since abandoned his kingdom in the face of Jarasandha’s attacks
to establish an outpost at Dwarka on the southwestern edge of Aryavarta. This
act of “dishonor” has earned him the eternal contempt of the ruling Kshatriya
nobility who are already ill-disposed to accept him as an equal due to his
cowherd past.
The
Firstborn, however, see him as a convenient pawn in their bid for supremacy. In
the past, Govinda has been instrumental in the success of the Scourge. His
enmity with Jarasandha makes him the perfect foil to the would-be emperor and
last refuge of the wrights. As Vyasa, leader of the Firstborn, tells his
disciples, Govinda is a “tiger who needs to be tamed” to their service.
A
resourceful politician and wily warrior, Govinda is happy to aid Vyasa’s
efforts.
But
there are hints of a deeper, darker plot in the background, a plan which makes
even his brother and friends uneasy…
Udayasankar
wields her prose deftly, drawing you swiftly into the story and holding your
interest thereafter.
In
her hands, the Mahabharat takes on a
darker, grittier aspect.
This
is no tale for children with the reassurance of a happy ending.
Prisoners
are brutally tortured and executed, ruling classes treat commoners with
contempt and derision, women are marginalized and restricted – especially in
the Kuru kingdom.
Bad
things can, and do, happen to good people.
While
the characters are all from the Mahabharat,
those familiar with the epic only through Amar
Chitra Katha or teleserials may find themselves at a loss.
Characters
are referred to by unfamiliar alternate names found in the epic. Yudhisthira is
Dharma, Arjuna is Partha, Duryodhana is Syodhana, Karna is Vasusena and so on
A
number of characters are presented in a refreshing new light.
Dharma
(Yudhishthira) – complex and self-serving, forever trying to project an image
of righteous otherworldliness while hungering for personal glory, disguising
his bids for power as burdensome duties he must take on for the greater good.
Syodhana
(Duryodhana) – peace-loving family man, increasingly dismayed to find himself
cast in the role of villain by Yudhsthira’s machinations.
Shikhandin
(Shikhandi) – a guerilla warrior par excellence, maligned as a coward because
he refused to blindly condone his father’s actions.
Panchali
(Draupadi) – Intelligent, thoughtful and every bit as fiery as her epic
counterpart, she takes a very active role in the politics of the day, far beyond
merely goading her husband/s into action.
Finally,
there is the fascinating Govinda Shauri (Krishna).
Charismatic,
charming, unfailingly polite and kind to everyone around him.
Yet,
at the same time, strangely detached and dispassionate, willing to manipulate
or sacrifice loved ones and unleash great suffering to achieve a desired end.
An
intriguing persona indeed - far more so than the annoying Bhagwan Sri Sri
Krishna we usually encounter.
In
summary, I heartily recommend Govinda.
Can’t wait for the next book to come out.
Nice review, Sir!
ReplyDeleteThe book seems to fall in the category of recent Indian fictions such as Ashwin Sanghi's Chanakya's Chant which re-tells the 340BC story in a contemporary setting! Re-telling the (so-called) epics in improvised or contemporary settings is becoming a trend, I guess! But, must be given a try if you're recommending it! :)
Thank you. I hope the book will be as good as the review. Also as good as the review suggests it is!
ReplyDeleteExtremely well articulated
ReplyDeleteThis is a topic that's close to my heart... Cheers! Where are
ReplyDeleteyour contact details though?
Here is my web page - vet care pet clinic